Grand Jury Target
We author a blog on white-collar investigation and prosecutions of corporate executives called Grand Jury Target. You can get a sense of how we think about cases and what we see as trends in these types of cases. We’ve written hundreds of posts over the years. You can read all of them or search for posts on specific topics here.
Our Most Recent Blog Posts
Why Isn’t Michael Cohen Getting a Cooperation Agreement? (Spoiler: He Probably Is) (Part One)
by Kropf Moseley Schmitt | Aug 28, 2018
Government Contractors Conducting Investigations: A New Normal?
by Kropf Moseley Schmitt | Aug 6, 2018
Initial Coin Offerings and SEC Enforcement: Protecting Investors (Part IA)
by Kropf Moseley Schmitt | Jul 5, 2018
Supreme Court Rules SEC Administrative Judges Are Unconstitutional, But Special Counsel Mueller is Safe
by Kropf Moseley Schmitt | Jun 22, 2018
The Department of Justice Should Drop the Inauguration Day Protest Cases
by Kropf Moseley Schmitt | Jun 11, 2018
Do Prosecutors Hate the Attorney-Client Privilege?
by Kropf Moseley Schmitt | May 7, 2018
Doing the Government’s Laundry
by Kropf Moseley Schmitt | Apr 23, 2018
The Government Is Probably Going to Win on the Michael Cohen TRO Motion
by Kropf Moseley Schmitt | Apr 13, 2018
What It Takes to Be a Trial Lawyer, If You Are a Woman
by Kropf Moseley Schmitt | Aug 14, 2018
Yes, Maybe the Government Does Hate the Attorney-Client Privilege—The Challenge of Protecting the Privilege for Civil Investigative Demands
by Kropf Moseley Schmitt | Jul 11, 2018
Prosecutors Sure Do Love the Perp Walk
by Kropf Moseley Schmitt | Jun 27, 2018
Surviving Parallel Proceedings
by Kropf Moseley Schmitt | Jun 19, 2018
Initial Coin Offerings and SEC Enforcement: Protecting Investors (Part I)
by Kropf Moseley Schmitt | May 30, 2018
OIG Investigations – Why Lawyers and Federal Employees Should Both Worry (Part III)
by Kropf Moseley Schmitt | Apr 30, 2018
Music City and the FCPA: What More Can You Want?
by Kropf Moseley Schmitt | Apr 14, 2018
The Search Warrant for Lawyer Michael Cohen’s Office – How Did That Happen? DOJ Policies Reviewed
by Kropf Moseley Schmitt | Apr 9, 2018
- 302s
- Acquittal After Jury Trial
- Advice of Counsel Defense
- Affirmative Defenses
- Antitrust
- Appeal
- Arrest
- Attorney client privilege
- Bail
- Bank fraud
- Blackmail/extortion
- Brady violations
- Bribery
- CFTC case
- Civil case
- Civil forfeiture
- Civil Litigation Strategy
- Classifiied information
- Commercial Bribery
- Compliance
- Computer fraud
- Conflict of interest
- Confrontation Clause
- Congressional investigation
- Conspiracy
- Continuing education
- Conviction After Jury Trial
- Criminal Discovery
- Criminal Forfeiture
- Criminal Investigation
- Deferred Prosecution Agreement
- Detention issues
- Discovery/Brady
- Dismissal of charges in indictment
- Disposition
- DOJ Policy and Practice
- DOJ Statements
- Double Jeopardy
- Due Diligence
- Electronic surveillance
- Environmental Crimes
- Ethics
- Evidence
- False Claims Act
- False statements
- FARA
- FBI policy and practice
- FCPA
- Federal program fraud
- Fifth Amendment
- First Amendment
- Forensic evidence
- Fourth Amendment
- Gag order
- Government contracting fraud
- Government Ethics
- Grand Jury
- Grand Jury Subpoena
- Health care fraud
- Honest Services
- Immunity
- Indictment
- Insider Trading
- Internal investigation
- International Trade Violations
- Investor fraud
- Joint Defense Agreements
- Juries
- Jury Instructions
- Jury issues
- Kickbacks
- Legal profession
- Mail Fraud
- Money Laundering
- Non-Prosecution Agreement
- Obstruction
- OIG investigations
- Perjury
- Personal Stories
- Plea Agreement
- Policy issues
- Political Prosecutions
- Pre-Trial Motions Practice
- Pretrial Matters
- Proffers
- Prosecutorial misconduct
- Public Corruption
- Research misconduct
- Resource Guide
- Restitution
- Reversal
- RICO
- Sean Combs Case
- Search warrant
- SEC Investigation
- SEC policy and practice
- SEC Settlement
- Securities fraud
- Selective/Vindictive Prosecution
- Sentencing
- Speedy Trial Act
- Statute of Limitations
- Stored Communications Act
- Subpoenas
- Taint teams
- Tax fraud
- Technology
- Top 10 posts
- Trade Secrets
- Travel Act
- Trial preparation
- Trial Strategy
- Trials
- Trump Administration
- Trump case
- Venue
- Wire Fraud
- Wiretaps
- Witness Preparation
- Witness tampering
Contact Us
Kropf Moseley Schmitt
Our practice is nationwide, but our office is in DC.
1100 H Street NW, Suite 1220
Washington, DC 20005
info@kmlawfirm.com
Contacting the firm or reading the materials on this website does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Kropf Moseley Schmitt. If you want to discuss hiring us, please click on the "contact" button above.
No confidential information should be sent over the internet.