By Sara Kropf In late 2017, I represented a client who participated in a protest against the inauguration of Donald Trump in the District of Columbia on January 20, 2017. She was charged with conspiracy to engage in felony rioting, among other things, and faced the...
DOJ Says Incomplete 302s Resulted from an “Inadvertent Failure of Process”: The Irony(!) and the Uncurable Prejudice of a Retrial
By Sara Kropf When a regular person does something wrong, the Department of Justice has no qualms about bringing criminal charges against him. When the Department of Justice does something wrong, well, it asks for a second chance. A few years ago, I wrote about...
Judges Should Stop Letting DOJ Get Away With Brady Violations
By Sara Kropf If the Department of Justice has accused someone of a crime, it's no surprise that he can’t say, “aw, ya got me,” and walk away from the accusation. Au contraire. DOJ will prosecute that person to the fullest extent of the law and the whole process will...
Can Prosecutors Avoid Creating Brady Material in FBI-302 Interview Memos? DOJ Guidance Is Not Enough (Part 2)
By Sara Kropf In the last post, I explored whether bad-actor prosecutors and agents can avoid creating Brady material in interview memos. If an agent doesn’t take notes documenting exculpatory statements made by a witness in a criminal investigation, and those...
Can Prosecutors Avoid Creating Brady Material in FBI-302 Interview Memos? Yes, They Can (Part 1)
By Sara Kropf I’ve written before about the serious problem of prosecutors not disclosing Brady material to a defendant. (See here and here. Oh, and here too.) Failure to turn over exculpatory evidence is a serious constitutional violation. It’s also incredibly...
SDNY Judge (Finally) Holds Prosecutors’ Feet to the Fire – Lessons Learned for Other Brady Cases
By Sara Kropf A year ago, I wrote a post lamenting the fact that prosecutors get every benefit of the doubt when it comes to whether they committed intentional Brady violations. My point was that judges routinely credit weak evidence of a defendant’s state of mind in...
Why Do Prosecutors Consistently Get the Benefit of the Doubt on Intent for Brady Violations?
By Sara Kropf In most white-collar cases, intent is the key issue. The government generally has to prove that the defendant intentionally acted to break the law and it wasn’t simply a mistake or an oversight. Circumstantial evidence is enough to prove intent, and, at...
Does the Government Have to Turn Over FBI 302s in Discovery?
By: Sara Kropf The government usually turns over interview memos, or FBI 302s, during discovery in a criminal case. As I’ve written before, a 302 is a summary of a witness interview written by an FBI agent. It is in narrative form, sometimes has quotes in it (but more...
The Department of Justice Should Drop the Inauguration Day Protest Cases
By: Sara Kropf The Department of Justice has been humiliated in its misguided prosecution of over two hundred Inauguration Day protestors. It has lost every single case to go to trial. It has engaged in intentional violations of the rules. And it has cost taxpayers...
Doing the Government’s Laundry
By Dan Portnov In certain legal (nerd) circles, coining a phrase or term of art is one of the surest ways to achieve immortality – think Tim Wu’s first use of “network neutrality” in a 2003 journal article or Justice Felix Frankfurter’s opinion in Rochin v....